Case Brief of People v. Geiger

You will write a case brief on a criminal law case. The criminal law case will be a case in which causation is a main issue in raised in the case.

Read and brief the case using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) method. Your case brief should be one to two double-spaced pages in length, using 12 point Times New Roman or Ariel font. The issue must be clearly identified.

The case is: People v. Geiger, 159 N.W.2d 383 https://www.leagle.com/decision/196834910michapp33…

Please refer to the attached document for resource assistance.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

National University Video games and Violent Behavior Agumentative Essay

Study the literature surrounding a topic related to social psychology, form a thesis statement, and then argue both for and against that thesis statement. Your thesis should be at the end of your first paragraph. Then provide a conclusion that summarizes the essay and takes a stance in support of your thesis. Include one reference to the textbook and at least four to peer-reviewed journal articles. You must have at least five references total. The assignment is worth 100 points.

Format (8 pages)

  • Title page
  • Abstract: 1 block paragraph on a separate page, 150-250 words in length
  • Essay: 5 pages
  • Reference page (listed on a separate page)
  • Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx)
  • 12-point font, 1-inch margins, double-spaced text
  • APA Style formatting throughout the paper
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

PSY355 Argosy University EBP Problem-Solving Strategies Paper

Your assignment this week has two parts. Be sure to read each part carefully prior to completion.

Part 1: Digesting EBP literature

Now that you have read and understood what is considered EBP and how to evaluate the studies effectively, you will start by completing the digest scholarly sources chart (Appendix III) on the research articles you have found thus far (approximately 5-7), while systematically organizing your EBP materials of the literature.

Completing this chart is an excellent way to organize research and keep structured notes on the content and bibliographical information of each entry, which will be useful for Week 7.

Part 1: Chart Length: 5-7 research articles

Part 2: EBP Discussion

The second part of this assignment is to write a brief reflection paper on EBPs. Be sure to include the following to reflect the process of defining, assessing ethical principles, and critiquing and evaluating the efficacy of EBPs:

  • A definition of an EBP.
  • Appropriate questions and their elements used in choosing an EBP.
  • An explanation of an evidence continuum that you consider valid in working I/O.
  • Your own view of the pros and cons of the use of EBPs regarding I/O.
  • A summary that evaluates the concept of EBPs and how you propose to utilize this concept regarding I/O.

For this assignment, you do not need to include resources other than the ones identified in the assignment.

Part 2: Reflection Paper Length: 3-4 pages, not including title and reference pages

Total length for Part 1 and Part 2: 3-4 pages, not including title and reference pages

Length: 5-7 research articles

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

ENG101 College of St Joseph Macbeth Tragic Flaw Essay

Use MLA format. Here is a link to help you with the MLA format:

The paper should have an introduction, at least three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Be sure to quote directly from the text you are analyzing in each of your body paragraphs. THE PAPER MUST BE AT LEAST THREE TYPED PAGES. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font and double space the essay.

MACBETH PAPER TOPICS:

1) While ambition to succeed is often considered to be an admirable trait, Macbeth’s “tragic flaw” is that he possesses too much ambition. Because he wants to be King of Scotland the moment he hears the witches prophesy, he commits regicide which leads to further murders and ultimately his death. Analyze Macbeth’s “tragic flaw” and why and how it leads to his downfall.

2) Early in the play, Lady Macbeth instructs Macbeth to “[l]ook like the innocent flower/But be the serpent under it” (2.1.4-5). Analyze the theme of “appearance vs. reality” throughout the play. Provide examples which illustrate how certain characters seem to be kind and generous to the public but actually have evil intentions.

3. Analyze the changes that occur in Macbeth’s or in Lady Macbeth’s character throughout the play. Show the qualities that are revealed in Act 1 and support your assertions with evidence from the text. Compare and contrast these with the qualities exhibited in Act 5. Be sure to select a few excellent quotations to illustrate your points.

4. Free choice!

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification Procedure

1.

a. 20 members of a local gang have been arrested for murder, armed robbery, and distribution of drugs. How will you, as a prosecutor, handle the following:

pretrial detention; preliminary hearing; bail; venue; arraignment; joinder and severance; and plea bargaining.Remember these gang members have other gang members still in the community. Witnesses are already being threatened as are the local sheriff’s deputies.

b. How will you as a defense attorney handle the above?

2.

Name and summarize ONE case in your OWN words that applies to one of the above issues.(Arrest, Interrogation,

and Identification Procedure). Give the case name, number, and YEAR when posting this.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Temple University Applied Business Ethics Case Study

Instructions:

Please answer the questions below. The length of your written case assignment

form responses should be approximately one to one and a half pages, single spaced. This form

will be graded on a pass/fail basis. To pass, you need to provide reasonably detailed and

insightful answers to the questions below.

1. First, what defines a bribe? Is a restaurant tip a bribe? How about a corporate invitation

to a luxury box at say a Phillies baseball game? What criteria can you list that

distinguishes a bribe?

2. Who are the stakeholders to Gordon’s decision as to whether to continue the bribe

payments or not? Please list them with a brief explanation.

3. As the case says, “What should Gordon do?” Do you continue with the bribe payments

(these clearly are bribes)? If so, why; if not, why not? Please indicate which ethical

perspective(s) (i.e., profit maximization, utilitarianism, universalism) support your

decision.

See case below

Getting Medicine to Bosnia: Acceptable Bribery?

As chief legal officer in a well-respected company making lifesaving drugs, Gordon Smith

was asked by his board of directors to look into rumors of bribery with the firm’s Bosnia

contract. The contract, he discovered, had been ordinary in almost every respect: A major

relief organization had contracted with his company to supply a million inexpensive kits of

medicine for delivery into the war-torn regions of Bosnia. Like most such contracts with

charitable organizations, it contained hardly any profit for his firm.

What he found strange, however, was the payment of an extraordinarily large commission

to a Romanian distributor to deliver the kits deep into Bosnia. Seeking out the executive in

his own firm who had negotiated the contract, he had one question in mind: Was this a

bribe?

Yes said the executive, it’s a bribe that we’re paying. According to the Romanian distributor,

the backs of the delivery trucks were loaded with the kits — and the glove compartments

were stuffed with cash. That way, when the drivers were stopped at roadblocks set up by

local militia units operating all across Bosnia, they could pay whatever was demanded and

continue their journey. In the past, he noted, drivers without cash had been taken from

their trucks and shot. If the kits were to be delivered, this was a cost of doing business.

Gordon felt sure that none of the money had flowed back to the executive, whose only

motive was to get the kits delivered. Gordon faced a dilemma. Should he draft a report to

the board on this most unorthodox contract? Or should he keep silent?

Analysis

Everything in Gordon’s background with his company told him that this contract was not the

way to do business. Bribery, he knew, was simply unacceptable to the board, who felt

strongly that once that barrier was breached, there would be no stopping the shakedowns in

the future.

But everything in his makeup as a compassionate being told him that providing medicine for

the wounded was of overriding importance, and that the normal ethic of commerce didn’t

apply in a war zone.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

GEN499 Ashford University Global Societal Issue Discussion Questions

1.

  • Identify the global societal issue you have chosen to research for your Final Paper, an argumentative essay, and explain why further research on this topic is important. (Final paper topic: Unemployment and lack of economic opportunities)
  • Provide a clear and concise thesis statement that includes a solution to the global societal issue
  • Explain how this global societal issue impacts a specific population.
  • Locate a peer-reviewed scholarly source and provide statistical data that you found surprising on the topic.

2.

  • Explain at least five differences between popular and scholarly sources used in research.
  • Locate and summarize one peer-reviewed, scholarly source from a University Library and one popular source that pertain to your Final Paper topic (unemployment and lack of economic opportunity). In your summary of each article, comment on the following: biases, reliability, strengths, and limitations.
  • From the sources you summarized, list and explain at least five visual cues from the peer-reviewed, scholarly source that were not evident in the popular source.

Only 250 words for each (#1 and #2)

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Accreditation: The Gold Seal of Approval

Conduct research online to located other exisiting accrediting bodies, CMS and/or state licensure standards . In a minimum of 250 words, compare and contrast your findings with the Joint Commission (JC) current requirements for patient communications including any differences between paper and electronic record requirements. Once your material is posted, be sure to review and comment on at least two of your peers postings. Your initial post to the given topic of discussion should contain a minimum of 2–3 peer-reviewed references.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

ENGL110 College of San Mateo Oedipus El Rey Play Interpretation Analysis

English 110 Essay #2: Interpretation of the play, due 6/25

Oedipus El Rey

by Luis Alfaro Malavade

Due dates: see Canvas

BACKGROUND:

As we move into more complex literary analysis, I would like you to try out using some of the

literary theories we have studied. With that in mind, I am offering several options for your essay 2 topics. The

discussions we have had about the play should help you develop your ideas and ultimately craft your own,

unique interpretation and analysis of the play.

TASK

:

Choose one of the following topics for essay 2:

1. Cultural Studies/Critical Race Theory: Consider the concept of fate/destiny/the prophecy in the play

from this lens as representing the prison system and/or institutional racism* (see CRT definition). How

does Alfaro use those concepts in the play to make a point about the prison system and/or institutional

racism? What language, characters, or events in the play reflect those systems as they operate

currently? How are those systems interpreted and presented?

From CRT

:

Institutionalized Racism

: This concept refers to the systemic ways dominant society

restricts a racialized individual or group’s access to opportunities. These inequalities, which include an

individual’s access to material conditions and power, are not only deeply imbedded in legal institutions,

but have been absorbed into American culture to such a degree that they are often invisible or easily

overlooked.

2. Character Analysis from a Cultural Studies lens: Does the work’s presentation support or condemn

Oedipus and his actions and why? Can it be seen to do both? Explain how you interpret the character

based on evidence from the text.

3. Cultural Studies: How does the play consider traditionally marginalized populations, in this case:

Chicanos living in poverty, or incarcerated men? How does it represent these populations?

4. Psychoanalytic Criticism: Consider the concept of fate/destiny/the prophecy in the play from a

Freudian perspective which assumes “that human beings are motivated, even driven, by desires, fears,

needs, and conflicts of which they are unaware.” How does Oedipus’ “fate/destiny/prophecy”

represent his unconscious desires, fears, needs and/or internal conflicts? How does he “unconsciously

behave in ways that will allow [him] to ‘play out’…[his] conflicted feelings about the painful experiences

and emotions [he] repress[es]” ?

5. Psychoanalytic Criticism: Analyze the tragic relationship between Oedipus and Jocasta: what does the

text suggest about the motivations for this relationship (on both sides) and what is your interpretation

of Alfaro’s choice to put this relationship at the center of the play rather than keep it “off-stage” as

Sophocles did? What does he want to show us through his depiction of their relationship?

Content Requirements/Grading Criteria:

Use the

introductory paragraph

to introduce the play and author, provide a brief summary that

will lead to your thesis, and state your thesis at the very end of your introduction paragraph.

Write

for an audience who is unfamiliar with the play.

Your

thesis

should provide an overall guiding statement of your specific interpretation of the play

in response to the topic question you selected, and should clearly indicate what you intend to

show/prove/argue in this paper.

(See thesis statement resources)

Use the

PIE paragraph

method to keep your body paragraphs focused and to deeply illustrate and

analyze your points. (See PIE/Effective Paragraph handout). Each paragraph should directly relate

to and develop part of your thesis.

Within each PIE paragraph, illustrate your point with

specific examples, ideas, and concepts

from the play

. Use direct quotes and paraphrasing and integrate all quotes. (See my handout on

quote integration).

In each paragraph, integrate several quotes to prove your point for that

paragraph. Always balance textual evidence (quotes) with equal or more analysis and

commentary from you, and demonstrate your close and careful reading of the play in your

analysis and commentary.

Organize

your paragraphs so that they connect to each other and so that your essay progresses

logically. In other words, your essay should not just be made up of individual paragraphs that serve

their own purpose. Instead, your paragraphs should present a unified, cohesive discussion that

addresses the topic you chose.

It is not required that you include counterarguments to your

thesis in this essay, but if you think it would make your essay stronger, feel free to do so.

Conclude

the essay with a paragraph that ties together your argument and convinces your

audience that this topic is worth examination.

Technical Requirements/Grading Criteria:

Final draft must be 4 FULL page or more in MLA format (including a unique title for your essay that

reflects your thesis in some way).

Please use in-text citations play: ex: (Alfaro 120), which refers to page 120. No works cited page

required for this essay unless you use sources I did not assign. Refer to the title of the play in

italics

,

not quotation marks.

It is not absolutely required that you use literary terms as part of your interpretation and analysis,

but if you do use the terms, be sure you use them correctly.

This includes any mention of the

literary theory or school of criticism you are using: remember my comment about “common

mistakes” students make in their essays—don’t do it!

Plagiarism is unacceptable and will result in an F. Develop your own ideas. If you use secondary sources

(anything besides the novel itself), cite them,

but remember this essay is about your individual

interpretation—not a research paper.

Put significant time and effort into your work. Revise and proofread your essay thoroughly before

submitting a final draft. (Remember this is a transfer level course.)

Points will be deducted for

misspelling Oedipus.

outline: due 6/24

After reading the essay prompt carefully, as well as the other essay writing required resources (particularly: information on Thesis Statements, PIE paragraphs, and Naysayers and Concession) please submit an outline for your essay. You should also view the example outline format I provided.

Please remember that an outline is not a rough draft! It should be quick and easy for me to scan. Here is an example (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Your outline should include:

  • Your thesis statement (see prompt for my requirement for your thesis statement)
  • Topic/point sentences–complete sentences–for each body paragraph (see my handouts on effective body paragraphs for what I’m looking for in a topic/point sentence).
  • Information/Evidence: indicate which passages from the play you will use in each body paragraph to illustrate your points. Please see requirement on essay prompt for how many quotes you need.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

5pg Paper on Discrimination

Week 2 – Assignment

Discrimination and Harassment

[WLOs: 2, 3, 4] [CLOs: 1, 2]

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or gender. Over the years, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued several rulings dealing with workplace discrimination and this Act. For this assignment, you will review the Religious Discrimination and Racial Harassment: What Ever Happened to Marshawn DeMur? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. case study. After you review the case study, address the following:

  • Examine the specific issues Maalick encountered in the workplace. Assess whether the actions of other workers at Treton represent discrimination and harassment. Evaluate the elements of law that are important for Treton to consider.
  • Assess the actions of the HR director, Marta Ford, in response to Maalick’s situation. Determine what she could have done to prevent the situation and what more could she do to ensure that this type of situation would not occur in the future.

The Discrimination and Harassment Paper

  • Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.