You are asked to evaluate employees’ exposures to methyl n-amyl ketone during a painting operation. After careful consideration, you choose NIOSH Method 2553 for the sampling. You can access the method by clicking the link below:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (2003). Ketones II: Method 2553. In P. M. Eiler & M. E. Cassinelli (Eds.), NIOSH manual of analytical methods (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/2553.pdf

Your pre-sampling and post-sampling pump calibrations using a primary standard are both 0.05 L/min. You collect personal samples on two employees working in the operation. The samples are collected for 430 minutes (Sample 1) and 440 minutes (Sample 2).

• Calculate the sample volumes for each of the samples.

The laboratory reports that the front section of Sample 1 contains 5,000 µg of methyl n-amyl ketone and the back section contains 200 µg of methyl n-amyl ketone. The front section of Sample 2 contains 4,000 µg of methyl n-amyl ketone and the back section contains 50 µg of methyl n-amyl ketone. Neither the front nor back sections of the field blank you supplied contain any detectable levels of methyl n-amyl ketone.

• Calculate the concentrations of the two personal samples in µg/L and mg/m³.
• Convert the result to ppm (MW for methyl n-amyl ketone = 114.2). Note: Use the ideal gas constant of 24.45.
• Show all the steps for your calculations.

You then reference OSHA’s Table Z-1 and find that the 8-hour TWA PEL for methyl n-amyl ketone is 100 ppm

• Discuss how the results of the two personal samples you collected compare to the OSHA PEL, and describe the sampling method you implemented.

You also look up the ACGIH TLV for methyl n-amyl ketone and find that the TLV is 50 ppm as an 8-hour TWA exposure.

• Discuss how the results for the two personal samples compare to the ACGIH TLV.
• Discuss whether you would recommend comparing the results of your sampling to the OSHA PEL or the ACGIH TLV. Include your rationale for the choice, and explain how you would rationalize your choice to your employer.

The case study should be a minimum of three pages in length, and you should cite the NIOSH document using APA style.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

You are required to select a nationally recognized fast casual restaurant chain and 3 of its menu items to demonstrate your knowledge of cost analysis for that product. Reminder that pizza restaurants are not an option for this project.

Submit your selected restaurant chain to your instructor and write 1-2 paragraphs on your rationalization for selection, noting which portfolio option you selected, in Microsoft Word. In addition, create a chart in Microsoft Word with the 3 menu items that you have chosen and populate it with the data you have researched on each of those items regarding ingredients, variance in preparation, price point, packaging, accessories, and any other relevant information you feel is helpful.

This submission is worth 25 points of your portfolio project due in Module 8.

Your paper must meet the following requirements:

• Your written paper should be 1 page in length not counting the one-page rationalization, title page, and reference page, which you must include.
• Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
• You need to cite at least 2 sources for this assignment, plus the textbook. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a great place to find resources.
• Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.).
• If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s (Links to an external site.) homepage.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Cas Study Jack and Diane are each 13 years old and are best friends. On September 12, 2012, Jack asked Diane to meet at Moe’s Convenience Store. While in the store, Jack steals three packs of gum and a candy bar. Jack hands Diane two boxes of candy to place in her purse. Diane places the candy in her purse. The store owner, Moe, notices Diane place items in her purse. As Jack and Diane exit the store, Moe calls their names and runs after them. Jack pushes Moe to the ground and exits with Diane. Moe calls the police and reports the theft. The police apprehend Jack and Diane a few blocks away from the store. The police only retrieve the boxes of candy from Diane but not the packs of gum nor the candy bar taken by Jack. The police escort Jack and Diane to the police station where they question them for two hours regarding the theft. Diane confesses her and Jack’s role in the theft. Jack denies any wrongdoing. The police charge Jack and Diane with theft and also charge Jack with simple assault. Their hearings are within the state mandated time after they are petitioned to appear in the local juvenile court. Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Preparing a Case A. What information would you want to know as a sentencing judge in Jack and Diane’s case? Provide a rationale for each choice. B. Explain how Jack and Diane will be treated as juvenile offenders as compared to adult offenders. Why? C. Why is it important to treat juveniles who commit offenses differently than adults? D. Describe how juveniles who commit offenses have historically been treated differently than adults. Why has this view evolved? Explain the due process rights afforded to Jack and Diane during the hearing process. Provide rationale for the evolution of the due process rights. E. Determine possible court-ordered options for Jack and Diane, defending your response. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a one‐ to two‐page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12‐point Times New Roman font, one‐inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

A couple of short notes—make sure to follow minimum word count requirements and use the minimum required peer reviewed journal articles. While more is always welcome, make sure to meet the minimum word count requirements for both the Discussion and Complete Units. It will take at least the minimum word count to answer the posed questions.Also, for each week the Discussion board will contain one initial post questions that each should have a minimum of a 250 word response by Wednesday of the assigned week and at least two responses to others in any combination between the two questions with at least 100 words each. This means there is a total minimum of two initial post responses and two replies to others. Discussion Board posts must be made during the assigned week to receive credit as that is when others will be in the course reading and benefiting from your posts. There should be a minimum of three peer reviewed journal articles each week included in the Discussion Board each week, inclusive of in-text citations and reference listing and APA format.

1. What are the ethical questions involved in requiring background checks for all person who are about to receive a job offer? How extensive should the check be?

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Overview

As you read in Chapter 4 of The Mismeasure of Crime, several forms of self-report studies are reviewed. One of those studies included the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, which was established by the National Institute of Justice to monitor drug use among arrestees in many jurisdictions of the United States. According to the authors, one of the main benefits of self-report studies in research is as a source of information provided by individuals based on their behavior, unfiltered by any official or judicial process. This self-study process was developed in an effort to counteract what were considered systematic biases and distortions in the data collected about crime from official measures. The ADAM study was based on data collected by interviewers interviewing arrestees who had been jailed or booked less than 48 hours for various drug offenses. This study fits into the self-report category because its subjects are focused in a group that was geared to provide more targeted information based on their known drug use.

For this assignment, you will access the 2008 ADAM II Annual Report, linked in the Resources. Select one illicit drug (for example, marijuana) for your research and respond following the instructions below.

Instructions

• Analyze differences in the use of this drug across the 10 cities in the ADAM report, based on your research of the ADAM study.
• Explain why the rates of use of the particular substance selected are higher or lower in some cities as compared to others.
• Specify what methodology was used to study the validity of self-reported drug consumption from ADAM studies.
• Explore some of the important effects of under-reporting.

Requirements

• Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• Resources and citations: Format according to APA guidelines.
• Required page count: 3–5, not including the cover page or the references page.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

You are required to submit your paper to Turnitin. Once you review your results and make any needed changes, submit your paper for grading.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

You may need access to the text in order to review materials needed in Chapter 4. Let me know and I will forward said information.

https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=36255

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.